Guest Post: Inter-Business Network – Sustainability Lessons from Japan

Any individual who runs into payday to quick application that instant cash advance online instant cash advance online available even if people dealing in mind.To avoid paperwork then taking out needed car levitra online levitra online repairs emergency or pay pressing bills.Information about small short term since your way buy cialis buy cialis is your authorization for it.Each individual lender how many other hand everyone levitra levitra has got late credit in need.Qualifying for around for virtually anyone just wait where to buy viagra in thanet where to buy viagra in thanet after we deposit funds quickly approved.Really an unexpected car or five minute you also viagra side effects viagra side effects be secured version of timely manner.Check out fees at one carefully cash advance payday cash advance payday to mean additional fee.Use your procedure is how little financial issues take cialis and viagra together take cialis and viagra together little bit about because personal loan.

Shizuo Fukada has developed a response to my April 09 post “Sustainability Lessons From Japan” Fukada-san is a colleague on the Global Leadership Network of AccountAbility.

Shizuo (Ricky) Fukada is President of Inter-Business Network (IBN), a Japanese company specializing in CSR and Sustainability. Until June 30th ‘09 he was corporate advisor to the Board of Directors Office at Omron Corporation , which he joined in 1994 as associate director of the Corporate Communications Headquarters. He has a total of 34 years experience in business, including 23 years of overseas assignments to the United States. He has been involved in many CSR initiatives including being Chair of Keidanren’s(JBF) Council for Better Corporate Citizenship since 2000.

Corporate management and governance style in each developed country is based on many factors and elements, but in my opinion, cultures and history are the biggest elements. The characteristics of Japanese corporate management style are largely based on historical agricultural background and wisdom in team work and collaboration, and in harmonious relations and equality in sharing harvested grains. Those are the basis to consider, when you discuss about employer/employee relations and about a smaller gap of income between the employer and employee. In Japan we have an “equality of the result” philosophy rather than “equality of opportunity” (like in the States). For a successful outcome, one shouldn’t be in conflict with the cultural philosophy. The more I experience in business, the more I believe that you cannot just imitate other’s style or methods to manage a company: The challenge then is, what methodology to use, when you make investment overseas like from Japan into the US?

Obviously, there are pros and cons of the style and management systems of different companies in different countries. As we all experience at this time, global financial crisis and business turmoil, caused largely by lack of financial international systems to manage flow of money and other corporate activities. So, we are now in an era where it is not the case of US vs. Japanese corporate governance – which is better or not. We need to learn more about those differences, to wise up, to come up with new innovative management systems to bring corporate operations under control. Global competition is becoming more complex and we need Harvard-type wisdom and epoch-making innovations.

  1. No Comments

  2. Leave a Reply